I believe that Facebook is Politically Targeting People .
I do not have the time nor the desire to post this burden Facebook places on me here, but Facebook you should really go read my latest posts on Vice President Mike Pence's Facebook page. That is REAL and honestly I do not need much to push me over the edge and just be done with it all. That means you as well are complicit in what can only be a political endeavour to destroy a selected group of peoples. Targeting people. All under the guise of a 'hate speech' terminology used as a weapon to gas-light people politically. Kool-aide drunk by fools.
You are Violating:
- my Freedom of Expression
- my Religious Convictions
- my Political Freedom
You are Damaging
- my Mental Health
- my Financial Health
- my Legal Health
You even cripple my ability to communicate to The Royal Family and my Monarch.
A corporation removing my ability to communicate with billions of people because of what a corporation believes.
Facebook, your actions are beyond CRIMINAL
The other week your employees decided to politically TARGET me. I am pretty sure that is exactly what had happened when the hits to this site peaked at the same time as my Facebook Account was continually freezing. I assume this was from multiple queries to your database looking for something to flag me on. You flagged me on words from the bible. Several hours later you found two more posts, I assume this was just to secure the political agenda of your employees. Now you hit me again for posts made in the same period over a meme that others have freely shared. It doesn't really matter if you believe that people should pluck their eye-balls out, the fact you believe that it is perfectly Ok for you to prevent me from expressing that people should not pluck their eye-balls out is a real problem for mankind.
You might have just pushed the final button. If I follow through with my thoughts right now you just changed, polarized and locked my responses to the Courts, the Government and perhaps even Her Majesty the Queen. Corporations policing people's thoughts, words and communications. Unacceptable.
The hypocrisy is astounding
Mansplaining - The usefulness of the term has been disputed.[33] Given its gender-specific nature and negative connotation, Lesley Kinzel described it as inherently biased, essentialist, dismissive, and a double standard.[34] In a 2016 Washington Postarticle, Cathy Young wrote that it is just one of a number of terms using "man" as a derogatory prefix, and that this convention is part of a "current cycle of misandry".[35] Meghan Daum, in a 2015 Los Angeles Times article, wrote that "To suggest that men are more qualified for the designation than women is not only sexist but almost as tone deaf as categorizing everything that a man says as mansplaining."[36] In 2014 Solnit herself said she had doubts about it: "[I]t seems to me to go a little heavy on the idea that men are inherently flawed this way, rather than that some men explain things they shouldn't and don't hear things they should."[37] As the word became more popular, several commentators complained that misappropriation had diluted its original meaning.[38] Joshua Sealy-Harrington and Tom McLaughlin wrote in newspaper The Globe and Mail that the term has been used as an ad hominem to silence debate.[39] Former British member of parliament Ann Widdecombe criticized the focus on mansplaining, noting progress on gender equality within her lifetime.[40]