At the time, I thought maybe they were visiting because of my comments regarding their Statics and Male Suicide. I was going to post exactly how I came up with those numbers from their Statistics (80 per week) which fall just slightly behind those of the United Kingdom, but I was busy. Then the news came out about what they were up to and in some ways I can actually defend the agenda. Why would anyone base Legislation on Theory rather than Real World Data? If there's no names and no identifiable markers going along with that information, then I do not really see an argument for all the fuss. Of course, maybe it's something else they are looking at? Anyways, only they know what they are up to. I am just saying hi with this post.
Sooner of later, I might get a hit from every Government Service on this site.Wordpress Post Archive
Datetime: 2018-11-04 04:09:02 +0000
Post Title: Statics Canada - Current Politics
Post Title: Statics Canada - Current Politics
With all the talk of Statistics Canada looking through the banking information of Canadians, I just want to wave and say hi. Someone from StatsCan was here reading a few weeks before that news broke out. Maybe I am one of the 500,000 ?
At the time, I thought maybe they were visiting because of my comments regarding their Statics and Male Suicide. I was going to post exactly how I came up with those numbers from their Statistics (80 per week) which fall just slightly behind those of the United Kingdom, but I was busy. Then the news came out about what they were up to and in some ways I can actually defend the agenda. Why would anyone base Legislation on Theory rather than Real World Data? If there's no names and no identifiable markers going along with that information, then I do not really see an argument for all the fuss. Of course, maybe it's something else they are looking at? Anyways, only they know what they are up to. I am just saying hi with this post.
Sooner of later, I might get a hit from every Government Service on this site.
At the time, I thought maybe they were visiting because of my comments regarding their Statics and Male Suicide. I was going to post exactly how I came up with those numbers from their Statistics (80 per week) which fall just slightly behind those of the United Kingdom, but I was busy. Then the news came out about what they were up to and in some ways I can actually defend the agenda. Why would anyone base Legislation on Theory rather than Real World Data? If there's no names and no identifiable markers going along with that information, then I do not really see an argument for all the fuss. Of course, maybe it's something else they are looking at? Anyways, only they know what they are up to. I am just saying hi with this post.
Sooner of later, I might get a hit from every Government Service on this site.