DAN BERLADYN

Wordpress Post Archive

Datetime: 2016-02-03 20:55:12 +0000
Post Title: 📧 ➡️ FW: PMPD and Neutrality - Addendum.

HI Jenn and PMPD,

I have to add something here.  I can be so long winded I miss much.  You had stated words and a leaning to the effect of I, Dan Berladyn, need to be moving forward and out of this house.  You had stated words to the effect that the PMPD does not want to deal with problem people and I had taken this as I stated/questioned you: the problem person, I Dan Berladyn, the Victim who initiated contact with you in September, is the problem you have?  There were also words to the effect of impending court cases if I do not get up and get moving out of my home.  There was also words to the effect of my mother feeling threatened.  Constable Morrison had put it to me in November that I, the person who saved my mother from losing this house and everything she owns is the problem.  To me, the words I hear both first hand and second are BIAS.  However that’s not the point to this addition.

Last night my mother phoned my Uncle Ike while I was with him.  He had no communication with her and hadn’t spoken at all to her since much of this began.  She somehow knew I was with him.  So someone back fed her knowledge of me.  If I was to assume, it would be both you and/or the doctors.  My mother was with my sister when she phoned my Uncle Ike Berladyn.  She clearly told him I have to pay “rent” if I am to continue staying here.  This goes against the information I heard from you today, some of which is written above.  I just wanted to add that bit of information.  She want’s “rent”, for me as another friend stated this is negotiations that he wishes I would see.  In many ways, if I don’t handle this correctly, it’s just more extortion.  They have financially devastated me, now they potentially want to extort more.

I’m not taking the time to correctly write this stuff, and in doing so that may hurt me.  However, what I would like from the PMPD is for the department to assess their bias, hopefully finding neutrality.  The other, is the removal of outside components.  There are two people in this household and two investors.  The rest is a side show of beneficiaries.  If you can, please keep it to the two persons involved.  Family is Family and I didn’t get to pick them.  I’d like to say neither did my father, extended family now is starting to ask why he passed away at 59.  They are starting to question the support he never had.  For me, I need slow correct steps to come out of this in either direction I take.  I ask you to help with that by remaining neutral and keeping it simple, the two direct parties involved.  My mother and I.  And Please note, the request for “rent” made just last night.  And also please note, this is the furthest I have ever been (down) financially.

Thank you for your time,
Dan Berladyn